Dr. Ananya Sharma

Dr. Ananya Sharma

CBSE Mathematics Reviewer

Ph.D. Mathematics Education, M.Sc. Mathematics, B.Ed.

M.Sc. MathematicsB.Ed.CTET Qualified

12+ years of CBSE-aligned teaching and content review experience

AffiliationIndependent CBSE Subject Matter Expert
88 chapters reviewed
9,251 questions reviewed
10 books
1 subject
7 exams

About the Reviewer

Dr. Ananya Sharma is a seasoned mathematics educator with over 12 years of experience teaching and reviewing CBSE mathematics content from Classes 6 through 12. She holds a Master's degree in Mathematics and a Bachelor of Education, and is CTET qualified. Her expertise spans algebra, geometry, trigonometry, statistics, and calculus, with a deep understanding of the CBSE examination pattern and NCERT textbook structure. She has contributed to curriculum-aligned question banks, stepwise solutions, and remedial content for Edzy.

Subjects and Classes Covered

The subjects and grade levels this reviewer regularly evaluates across Edzy's CBSE-aligned content.

Subjects Reviewed

Mathematics

Classes Covered

Class 6Class 7Class 8Class 9Class 10Class 11Class 12

Expertise and Review Focus

What this reviewer brings academically and the kinds of content they help validate for students.

Areas of Expertise

NCERT-aligned mathematics explanationsMCQ validation and distractor analysisStepwise solution reviewBoard exam practice question curationCompetitive exam mathematics content (JEE Foundation)

Review Scope

Reviews Edzy mathematics explanations, summaries, practice questions, stepwise solutions, and answer rationales for CBSE Classes 6–12.

Review Methodology

The review checks used to keep explanations, questions, and solutions aligned with classroom expectations and the CBSE curriculum.

  • Checks curriculum alignment with NCERT/CBSE learning outcomes
  • Reviews mathematical accuracy of explanations and solutions
  • Validates question difficulty progression and grade-level appropriateness
  • Ensures stepwise solutions are pedagogically sound and complete
  • Verifies MCQ distractors are plausible and instructive